ASpdb: an integrative knowledgebase of human protein isoforms from experimental and AI-predicted structures
ASpdb Logo

Home

Download

Statistics

Examples

Help

Contact

Terms of Use

Center for Computational Systems Medicine
leaf

Protein Summary

leaf

AS Summary

leaf

Protein Functional Features

leaf

Gene Isoform Structures and Expression Levels

leaf

Protein Structures

leaf

pLDDT Score Distribution

leaf

Ramachandran Plot of Protein Structures

leaf

Potential Active Site Information

leaf

Protein Structure and Feature Comparision

leaf

Protein-Protein Interaction

leaf

Related Drugs

leaf

Related Diseases

leaf

Clinically Important Variants

Protein:TERT

Protein Summary

check button Gene summary
Gene name: TERT
ASpdb.0 ID: 7015
Gene
Gene symbol

TERT

Gene ID

7015

Gene nametelomerase reverse transcriptase
SynonymsCMM9|DKCA2|DKCB4|EST2|PFBMFT1|TCS1|TP2|TRT|hEST2|hTRT
Cytomap

5p15.33

Type of geneprotein-coding
Descriptiontelomerase reverse transcriptasetelomerase catalytic subunittelomerase-associated protein 2
Modification date20240416
UniProtAcc

O14746


check button Gene ontology of this gene with evidence of Inferred from Direct Assay (IDA) from Entrez
PartnerGeneGO IDGO termPubMed ID
GeneTERT

GO:0000049

tRNA binding

21937513

GeneTERT

GO:0000333

telomerase catalytic core complex

9398860|9443919|16507993|17940095|18082603

GeneTERT

GO:0000781

chromosome, telomeric region

25589350

GeneTERT

GO:0001172

RNA-templated transcription

19701182

GeneTERT

GO:0003677

DNA binding

21937513

GeneTERT

GO:0003720

telomerase activity

9398860|9443919|12135483|16043710|16507993|17940095|18082603|21531765|29695869

GeneTERT

GO:0003721

telomerase RNA reverse transcriptase activity

9398860|15632080|17940095|19701182

GeneTERT

GO:0003964

RNA-directed DNA polymerase activity

21937513

GeneTERT

GO:0003968

RNA-dependent RNA polymerase activity

19701182

GeneTERT

GO:0005634

nucleus

21829167|24415760

GeneTERT

GO:0005654

nucleoplasm

19567472

GeneTERT

GO:0005697

telomerase holoenzyme complex

12135483|18082603|29695869

GeneTERT

GO:0005730

nucleolus

22226966

GeneTERT

GO:0005829

cytosol

-

GeneTERT

GO:0006278

RNA-templated DNA biosynthetic process

9398860

GeneTERT

GO:0007004

telomere maintenance via telomerase

9443919|16043710|17940095|19701182|21531765|29695869

GeneTERT

GO:0007005

mitochondrion organization

21937513

GeneTERT

GO:0010629

negative regulation of gene expression

11927518

GeneTERT

GO:0016605

PML body

19567472

GeneTERT

GO:0016607

nuclear speck

-

GeneTERT

GO:0022616

DNA strand elongation

16043710

GeneTERT

GO:0030422

siRNA processing

19701182

GeneTERT

GO:0031647

regulation of protein stability

24415760|26194824

GeneTERT

GO:0032092

positive regulation of protein binding

24415760

GeneTERT

GO:0042645

mitochondrial nucleoid

21937513

GeneTERT

GO:0042803

protein homodimerization activity

11432839

GeneTERT

GO:0051000

positive regulation of nitric-oxide synthase activity

11927518

GeneTERT

GO:0070034

telomerase RNA binding

11432839

GeneTERT

GO:0070200

establishment of protein localization to telomere

25589350

GeneTERT

GO:0071897

DNA biosynthetic process

9398860

GeneTERT

GO:0098680

template-free RNA nucleotidyltransferase

19701182

GeneTERT

GO:0140745

siRNA transcription

19701182

GeneTERT

GO:1904751

positive regulation of protein localization to nucleolus

24415760

GeneTERT

GO:1990572

TERT-RMRP complex

19701182

GeneTERT

GO:2000773

negative regulation of cellular senescence

11927518



AS Summary

check button Information of the canonical protein with experimentally identified structure from PDB (2023).
UniProt AccFile namePDB IDMethodResolutionChainStartEnd
O14746-1O14746-1_5ugw_A.pdb5UGWX-ray2.31A9651122

check button ASpdb's canonical and alternatively spliced isoform information.
accession_idgene_namecanonical_idalternative_idcanonical_lengthalternative_lengthcanonical_startcanonical_endtypeoriginalSEQvariationSEQalternative_startalternative_end
O14746TERTO14746-1O14746-21132807764807SubstitutionSTLTDLQPYMRQFVAHLQETSPLRDAVVIEQSSSLNEASSGLFDLRPVPGDPAGLHPLHAALQPVLRRHGEQAVCGDSAGRAAPAFGG764807
O14746TERTO14746-1O14746-211328078081132Deletionnonenone807807
O14746TERTO14746-1O14746-311321069885947Deletionnonenone884884
O14746TERTO14746-1O14746-41132795711722Deletionnonenone710710
O14746TERTO14746-1O14746-41132795764807SubstitutionSTLTDLQPYMRQFVAHLQETSPLRDAVVIEQSSSLNEASSGLFDLRPVPGDPAGLHPLHAALQPVLRRHGEQAVCGDSAGRAAPAFGG752795
O14746TERTO14746-1O14746-411327958081132Deletionnonenone795795

check buttonMultiple sequence alignment of our canonical and alternatively spliced TERT

check button Matched gene isoform IDs with Ensembl and RefSeq of our canonical and alternative spliced genes of TERT
UniProt-idENSGENSTENSP
O14746-1ENSG00000164362.21ENST00000310581.10ENSP00000309572.5
O14746-3ENSG00000164362.21ENST00000334602.10ENSP00000334346.6
O14746-4ENSG00000164362.21ENST00000460137.6ENSP00000425003.1

UniProt-idNM IDNP ID
O14746-1NM_198253.2NP_937983.2
O14746-3NM_001193376.1NP_001180305.1

check buttonAmino acid sequences of our canonical and alternatively spliced TERT
accession_idProtein sequence
O14746-1MPRAPRCRAVRSLLRSHYREVLPLATFVRRLGPQGWRLVQRGDPAAFRALVAQCLVCVPWDARPPPAAPSFRQVSCLKELVARVLQRLCE
RGAKNVLAFGFALLDGARGGPPEAFTTSVRSYLPNTVTDALRGSGAWGLLLRRVGDDVLVHLLARCALFVLVAPSCAYQVCGPPLYQLGA
ATQARPPPHASGPRRRLGCERAWNHSVREAGVPLGLPAPGARRRGGSASRSLPLPKRPRRGAAPEPERTPVGQGSWAHPGRTRGPSDRGF
CVVSPARPAEEATSLEGALSGTRHSHPSVGRQHHAGPPSTSRPPRPWDTPCPPVYAETKHFLYSSGDKEQLRPSFLLSSLRPSLTGARRL
VETIFLGSRPWMPGTPRRLPRLPQRYWQMRPLFLELLGNHAQCPYGVLLKTHCPLRAAVTPAAGVCAREKPQGSVAAPEEEDTDPRRLVQ
LLRQHSSPWQVYGFVRACLRRLVPPGLWGSRHNERRFLRNTKKFISLGKHAKLSLQELTWKMSVRDCAWLRRSPGVGCVPAAEHRLREEI
LAKFLHWLMSVYVVELLRSFFYVTETTFQKNRLFFYRKSVWSKLQSIGIRQHLKRVQLRELSEAEVRQHREARPALLTSRLRFIPKPDGL
RPIVNMDYVVGARTFRREKRAERLTSRVKALFSVLNYERARRPGLLGASVLGLDDIHRAWRTFVLRVRAQDPPPELYFVKVDVTGAYDTI
PQDRLTEVIASIIKPQNTYCVRRYAVVQKAAHGHVRKAFKSHVSTLTDLQPYMRQFVAHLQETSPLRDAVVIEQSSSLNEASSGLFDVFL
RFMCHHAVRIRGKSYVQCQGIPQGSILSTLLCSLCYGDMENKLFAGIRRDGLLLRLVDDFLLVTPHLTHAKTFLRTLVRGVPEYGCVVNL
RKTVVNFPVEDEALGGTAFVQMPAHGLFPWCGLLLDTRTLEVQSDYSSYARTSIRASLTFNRGFKAGRNMRRKLFGVLRLKCHSLFLDLQ
VNSLQTVCTNIYKILLLQAYRFHACVLQLPFHQQVWKNPTFFLRVISDTASLCYSILKAKNAGMSLGAKGAAGPLPSEAVQWLCHQAFLL
O14746-2MPRAPRCRAVRSLLRSHYREVLPLATFVRRLGPQGWRLVQRGDPAAFRALVAQCLVCVPWDARPPPAAPSFRQVSCLKELVARVLQRLCE
RGAKNVLAFGFALLDGARGGPPEAFTTSVRSYLPNTVTDALRGSGAWGLLLRRVGDDVLVHLLARCALFVLVAPSCAYQVCGPPLYQLGA
ATQARPPPHASGPRRRLGCERAWNHSVREAGVPLGLPAPGARRRGGSASRSLPLPKRPRRGAAPEPERTPVGQGSWAHPGRTRGPSDRGF
CVVSPARPAEEATSLEGALSGTRHSHPSVGRQHHAGPPSTSRPPRPWDTPCPPVYAETKHFLYSSGDKEQLRPSFLLSSLRPSLTGARRL
VETIFLGSRPWMPGTPRRLPRLPQRYWQMRPLFLELLGNHAQCPYGVLLKTHCPLRAAVTPAAGVCAREKPQGSVAAPEEEDTDPRRLVQ
LLRQHSSPWQVYGFVRACLRRLVPPGLWGSRHNERRFLRNTKKFISLGKHAKLSLQELTWKMSVRDCAWLRRSPGVGCVPAAEHRLREEI
LAKFLHWLMSVYVVELLRSFFYVTETTFQKNRLFFYRKSVWSKLQSIGIRQHLKRVQLRELSEAEVRQHREARPALLTSRLRFIPKPDGL
RPIVNMDYVVGARTFRREKRAERLTSRVKALFSVLNYERARRPGLLGASVLGLDDIHRAWRTFVLRVRAQDPPPELYFVKVDVTGAYDTI
O14746-3MPRAPRCRAVRSLLRSHYREVLPLATFVRRLGPQGWRLVQRGDPAAFRALVAQCLVCVPWDARPPPAAPSFRQVSCLKELVARVLQRLCE
RGAKNVLAFGFALLDGARGGPPEAFTTSVRSYLPNTVTDALRGSGAWGLLLRRVGDDVLVHLLARCALFVLVAPSCAYQVCGPPLYQLGA
ATQARPPPHASGPRRRLGCERAWNHSVREAGVPLGLPAPGARRRGGSASRSLPLPKRPRRGAAPEPERTPVGQGSWAHPGRTRGPSDRGF
CVVSPARPAEEATSLEGALSGTRHSHPSVGRQHHAGPPSTSRPPRPWDTPCPPVYAETKHFLYSSGDKEQLRPSFLLSSLRPSLTGARRL
VETIFLGSRPWMPGTPRRLPRLPQRYWQMRPLFLELLGNHAQCPYGVLLKTHCPLRAAVTPAAGVCAREKPQGSVAAPEEEDTDPRRLVQ
LLRQHSSPWQVYGFVRACLRRLVPPGLWGSRHNERRFLRNTKKFISLGKHAKLSLQELTWKMSVRDCAWLRRSPGVGCVPAAEHRLREEI
LAKFLHWLMSVYVVELLRSFFYVTETTFQKNRLFFYRKSVWSKLQSIGIRQHLKRVQLRELSEAEVRQHREARPALLTSRLRFIPKPDGL
RPIVNMDYVVGARTFRREKRAERLTSRVKALFSVLNYERARRPGLLGASVLGLDDIHRAWRTFVLRVRAQDPPPELYFVKVDVTGAYDTI
PQDRLTEVIASIIKPQNTYCVRRYAVVQKAAHGHVRKAFKSHVSTLTDLQPYMRQFVAHLQETSPLRDAVVIEQSSSLNEASSGLFDVFL
RFMCHHAVRIRGKSYVQCQGIPQGSILSTLLCSLCYGDMENKLFAGIRRDGLLLRLVDDFLLVTPHLTHAKTFLSYARTSIRASLTFNRG
FKAGRNMRRKLFGVLRLKCHSLFLDLQVNSLQTVCTNIYKILLLQAYRFHACVLQLPFHQQVWKNPTFFLRVISDTASLCYSILKAKNAG
O14746-4MPRAPRCRAVRSLLRSHYREVLPLATFVRRLGPQGWRLVQRGDPAAFRALVAQCLVCVPWDARPPPAAPSFRQVSCLKELVARVLQRLCE
RGAKNVLAFGFALLDGARGGPPEAFTTSVRSYLPNTVTDALRGSGAWGLLLRRVGDDVLVHLLARCALFVLVAPSCAYQVCGPPLYQLGA
ATQARPPPHASGPRRRLGCERAWNHSVREAGVPLGLPAPGARRRGGSASRSLPLPKRPRRGAAPEPERTPVGQGSWAHPGRTRGPSDRGF
CVVSPARPAEEATSLEGALSGTRHSHPSVGRQHHAGPPSTSRPPRPWDTPCPPVYAETKHFLYSSGDKEQLRPSFLLSSLRPSLTGARRL
VETIFLGSRPWMPGTPRRLPRLPQRYWQMRPLFLELLGNHAQCPYGVLLKTHCPLRAAVTPAAGVCAREKPQGSVAAPEEEDTDPRRLVQ
LLRQHSSPWQVYGFVRACLRRLVPPGLWGSRHNERRFLRNTKKFISLGKHAKLSLQELTWKMSVRDCAWLRRSPGVGCVPAAEHRLREEI
LAKFLHWLMSVYVVELLRSFFYVTETTFQKNRLFFYRKSVWSKLQSIGIRQHLKRVQLRELSEAEVRQHREARPALLTSRLRFIPKPDGL
RPIVNMDYVVGARTFRREKRAERLTSRVKALFSVLNYERARRPGLLGASVLGLDDIHRAWRTFVLRVRAQDPPPELYFVKDRLTEVIASI

Protein Functional Features

check buttonMain function of this protein. (from UniProt)
TERT (go to UniProt):O14746

check buttonRetention analysis result of protein across 39 protein features of UniProt such as six molecule processing features, 13 region features, four site features, six amino acid modification features, two natural variation features, five experimental info features, and 3 secondary structure features. Here, because of limited space for viewing, we only show the protein feature retention information belong to the 13 regional features. All retention annotation result can be downloaded at

download page

* Minus value of BPloci means that the break pointn is located before the CDS.
- Retained protein feature among the 13 regional features.
Accession_idSubsectionStartEndFuncitonal featureSplicing information
O14746Domain605935Note=Reverse transcriptase;Ontology_term=ECO:0000255;evidence=ECO:0000255|PROSITE-ProRule:PRU00405Type=Substitution;Start=764;End=807
O14746Domain605935Note=Reverse transcriptase;Ontology_term=ECO:0000255;evidence=ECO:0000255|PROSITE-ProRule:PRU00405Type=Deletion;Start=808;End=1132
O14746Domain605935Note=Reverse transcriptase;Ontology_term=ECO:0000255;evidence=ECO:0000255|PROSITE-ProRule:PRU00405Type=Deletion;Start=885;End=947
O14746Domain605935Note=Reverse transcriptase;Ontology_term=ECO:0000255;evidence=ECO:0000255|PROSITE-ProRule:PRU00405Type=Deletion;Start=711;End=722
O14746Domain605935Note=Reverse transcriptase;Ontology_term=ECO:0000255;evidence=ECO:0000255|PROSITE-ProRule:PRU00405Type=Substitution;Start=764;End=807
O14746Domain605935Note=Reverse transcriptase;Ontology_term=ECO:0000255;evidence=ECO:0000255|PROSITE-ProRule:PRU00405Type=Deletion;Start=808;End=1132
O14746Region914928Note=Required for oligomerizationType=Deletion;Start=808;End=1132
O14746Region914928Note=Required for oligomerizationType=Deletion;Start=885;End=947
O14746Region914928Note=Required for oligomerizationType=Deletion;Start=808;End=1132
O14746Region930934Note=Primer grip sequenceType=Deletion;Start=808;End=1132
O14746Region930934Note=Primer grip sequenceType=Deletion;Start=885;End=947
O14746Region930934Note=Primer grip sequenceType=Deletion;Start=808;End=1132
O14746Region9361132Note=CTEType=Deletion;Start=808;End=1132
O14746Region9361132Note=CTEType=Deletion;Start=885;End=947
O14746Region9361132Note=CTEType=Deletion;Start=808;End=1132


Gene Isoform Structures and Expression Levels for TERT

check buttonGene structures of our canonical and alternative spliced genes of TERT
* Click on the image to open the UCSC genome browser with custom track showing this image in a new window.
gene isoform structure of TERT

check button Expression levels of gene isoforms across GTEx.
gtex expression

check button Expression levels of gene isoforms across TCGA.
tcga expression


Protein Structures

check button PDB and CIF files of the predicted protein structures
* Here we show the 3D structure of the proteins using Mol*. AlphaFold produces a per-residue confidence score (pLDDT) between 0 and 100. Model confidence is shown from the pLDDT values per residue. pLDDT corresponds to the model’s prediction of its score on the local Distance Difference Test. It is a measure of local accuracy (from AlphfaFold website). To color code individual residues, we transformed individual PDB files into CIF format.
3D view using mol* of O14746-1
3D view using mol* of O14746-2
3D view using mol* of O14746-3
3D view using mol* of O14746-4


pLDDT Score Distribution

check button pLDDT score distribution of the predicted protein structures from AlphaFold2
* AlphaFold produces a per-residue confidence score (pLDDT) between 0 and 100.
pLDDT distribution across the protein length of O14746-1
all structure
pLDDT distribution across the protein length of O14746-2
all structure
pLDDT distribution across the protein length of O14746-3
all structure
pLDDT distribution across the protein length of O14746-4
all structure


Ramachandran Plot of Protein Structures


check button Ramachandran plot of the torsional angles - phi (φ)and psi (ψ) - of the residues (amino acids) contained in this protein peptide.
Ramachandran plot of O14746-1
all structure
Ramachandran plot of O14746-3
all structure
Ramachandran plot of O14746-4
all structure

Potential Active Site Information


check button The potential binding sites of these proteins were identified using SiteMap, a module of the Schrodinger suite.
UniProt-idSite scoreSizeD scoreVolumeExposureEnclosureContactPhobicPhilicBalanceDon/AccResidues
O14746-11.0071801.002531.3070.5210.7090.9210.6251.1150.5610.622105,106,108,123,606,610,611,612,613,614,615,616,61
7,618,619,636,639,640,645,646,647,649,650,651,653,
654,656,657,660,741,743,795,796,797,800,819,822,82
3,824
O14746-21.0615651.0971389.4930.510.7470.9230.7470.8920.8380.7279,10,13,14,78,82,96,99,100,114,115,123,124,125,126
,127,129,130,132,159,165,166,167,168,169,174,175,1
76,637,648,651,652,655,656,659,660,662,663,666,667
,670,671,739,740,741,742,743,744,745,746,747,748,7
49,756,758,759,760,761,762,763,764,765,766,767,770
,771,772,773,774,775,777,780,781,783,784,785,787,7
88,789,791,792
O14746-31.066900.958152.2920.3570.8521.1781.2541.3650.9190.567606,610,611,612,613,615,616,618,639,640,647,650,65
1,654,817,819,822,824
O14746-41.0931081.15331.6810.5020.7480.9681.4020.7311.9180.55346,49,50,53,127,129,130,131,133,134,135,136,137,16
0,162,168,170,759,760,761,762,764,765,766,769

Protein Structure and Feature Comparision


check button Protein Structure Comparision Using Template Modeling Scores (TM-score).
all structure

check button Protein Structure Comparision Visualization with mol*. between Canonical predicted structure (AF2)(orange) vs Canonical validated structure (PDB)(green)
3D view using mol* of O14746-1_O14746-1_5ugw_A.pdb

check button Protein Structure Comparision Visualization with mol*. between Canonical validated structure (PDB)(orange) vs Alternative predicted structure (AF2)(green)
3D view using mol* of O14746-1_5ugw_A_O14746-2.pdb
3D view using mol* of O14746-1_5ugw_A_O14746-3.pdb
3D view using mol* of O14746-1_5ugw_A_O14746-4.pdb

check button Protein Structure Comparision Visualization with mol*. between Canonical predicted structure (AF2)(orange) vs Alternative predicted structure (AF2)(green)
3D view using mol* of O14746-1_O14746-2.pdb
3D view using mol* of O14746-1_O14746-3.pdb
3D view using mol* of O14746-1_O14746-4.pdb

check button Protein Feature Comparison of the protein sequendary structures among the protiens.
./stats/secondary_structure/figure/O14746-1_vs_O14746-2.png
all structure<
./stats/secondary_structure/figure/O14746-1_vs_O14746-3.png
all structure<
./stats/secondary_structure/figure/O14746-1_vs_O14746-4.png
all structure<

check button Protein Feature Comparison of the relative accessible surface area (ASA) among the protiens.
./stats/relative_asa/O14746-1_vs_O14746-2.png
all structure<
./stats/relative_asa/O14746-1_vs_O14746-3.png
all structure<
./stats/relative_asa/O14746-1_vs_O14746-4.png
all structure<


Protein-Protein Interaction


check button Interactors from UniProt.
Accession_idSubsectionStartEndFuncitonal featureSplicing information


check button Interactors from STRING.
Gene nameInteractors


Related Drugs to TERT


check button Drugs targeting this gene/protein.
(DrugBank)
UniProt accessionGene nameDrugBank IDDrug nameDrug groupActions
O14746TERTDB00495Zidovudineapprovedinhibitor
O14746TERTDB12747Tertomotideinvestigational
O14746TERTDB05036Grn163linvestigational

Related Diseases to TERT


check button Previous studies relating to the alternative splicing of TERT and disease information from the MeSH term (PubMed)
GenePMIDTitleAbstractMeSH IDMeSH term
TERT12598334Full-length telomerase reverse transcriptase messenger RNA is an independent prognostic factor in neuroblastoma.Telomerase activity (TA) is the most recently recognized prognostic factor in neuroblastoma, and its outstanding predictive power was documented by several studies. However, TA measurements require fresh tumor tissue that is not always available in daily clinical practice. We previously described a reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction assay that we used to investigate the possible prognostic relevance of the telomerase catalytic subunit, hTERT, at the mRNA level. Because hTERT mRNA undergoes alternative splicing as a regulatory mechanism of TA, we discriminated between truncated and full-length hTERT transcripts. In a retrospective study on 124 neuroblastomas, 56 (45.2%) tumors showed spliced hTERT transcripts, whereas 30 (24.2%) contained full-length hTERT transcripts. The presence of both spliced and full-length hTERT transcripts was significantly associated with MYCN amplification. hTERT in general showed no correlation to other prognostic factors, ie, International Neuroblastoma Staging System stage, International Neuroblastoma Pathology classification grade, or age at diagnosis, whereas the presence of full-length transcripts was significantly associated with higher stages. The presence of any hTERT transcripts carried no significant prognostic information, yet full-length hTERT transcripts were highly predictive of poor outcome (P < 0.0001). In a multivariate analysis, full-length hTERT transcripts and International Neuroblastoma Pathology classification grade emerged as the sole independent predictors of event-free survival, with relative risks of 10.0 and 3.9, respectively. The strong statistical correlation of full-length hTERT transcripts with clinical outcome in neuroblastoma suggests that the reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction analysis of hTERT transcripts may be equatable to TA measurements. Because this assay is well suited for archival material, it could become a useful adjunct in evaluating the prognosis of individual neuroblastoma cases.D001932Brain Neoplasms
TERT12598334Full-length telomerase reverse transcriptase messenger RNA is an independent prognostic factor in neuroblastoma.Telomerase activity (TA) is the most recently recognized prognostic factor in neuroblastoma, and its outstanding predictive power was documented by several studies. However, TA measurements require fresh tumor tissue that is not always available in daily clinical practice. We previously described a reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction assay that we used to investigate the possible prognostic relevance of the telomerase catalytic subunit, hTERT, at the mRNA level. Because hTERT mRNA undergoes alternative splicing as a regulatory mechanism of TA, we discriminated between truncated and full-length hTERT transcripts. In a retrospective study on 124 neuroblastomas, 56 (45.2%) tumors showed spliced hTERT transcripts, whereas 30 (24.2%) contained full-length hTERT transcripts. The presence of both spliced and full-length hTERT transcripts was significantly associated with MYCN amplification. hTERT in general showed no correlation to other prognostic factors, ie, International Neuroblastoma Staging System stage, International Neuroblastoma Pathology classification grade, or age at diagnosis, whereas the presence of full-length transcripts was significantly associated with higher stages. The presence of any hTERT transcripts carried no significant prognostic information, yet full-length hTERT transcripts were highly predictive of poor outcome (P < 0.0001). In a multivariate analysis, full-length hTERT transcripts and International Neuroblastoma Pathology classification grade emerged as the sole independent predictors of event-free survival, with relative risks of 10.0 and 3.9, respectively. The strong statistical correlation of full-length hTERT transcripts with clinical outcome in neuroblastoma suggests that the reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction analysis of hTERT transcripts may be equatable to TA measurements. Because this assay is well suited for archival material, it could become a useful adjunct in evaluating the prognosis of individual neuroblastoma cases.D009447Neuroblastoma
TERT14654914Differential alternative splicing expressions of telomerase reverse transcriptase in gastrointestinal cell lines.Telomerase is a cellular RNA-dependent DNA polymerase that serves to maintain the tandem arrays of telomeric TTAGGG repeats at eukaryotic chromosome ends. One of the human telomerase components is hTERT, which has three alternative spliced sites that introduce eight isoforms of hTERT mRNA. The expression of these isoforms in gastrointestinal cell lines is unknown. We developed a PCR-based assay for detecting these splicing variants. In gastric and hepatocellular carcinoma cell lines, the gamma deletion variant and its combination variants, alpha- and gamma-, beta- and gamma-, and alpha-, beta- and gamma-deletion variants were frequently detected, while they were not detected in colorectal carcinoma cell lines. Our results provide important information of use for more detailed studies on the regulation of telomerase activity.D005770Gastrointestinal Neoplasms
TERT16170363Hypoxic regulation of telomerase gene expression by transcriptional and post-transcriptional mechanisms.Basal telomerase activity is dependent on expression of the hTERT and hTR genes and upregulation of telomerase gene expression is associated with tumour development. It is therefore possible that signal transduction pathways involved in tumour development and features of the tumour environment itself may influence telomerase gene regulation. The majority of solid tumours contain regions of hypoxia and it has recently been demonstrated that hypoxia can increase telomerase activity by mechanisms that are still poorly defined. Here, we show that hypoxia induces the transcriptional activity of both hTR and hTERT gene promoters. While endogenous hTR expression is regulated at the transcriptional level, hTERT is subject to regulation by alternative splicing under hypoxic conditions, which involves a switch in the splice pattern in favour of the active variant. Furthermore, analysis of the chromatin landscape of the telomerase promoters reveals dynamic recruitment of a transcriptional complex involving the hypoxia-inducible factor-1 transcription factor, p300, RNA polymerase II and TFIIB, to both promoters during hypoxia, which traffics along and remains associated with the hTERT gene as transcription proceeds. These studies show that hTERT and hTR are subject to similar controls under hypoxia and highlight the rapid and dynamic regulation of the telomerase genes in vivo.D000860Hypoxia
TERT16939641Characterization of novel alternative splicing sites in human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT): analysis of expression and mutual correlation in mRNA isoforms from normal and tumour tissues.Human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT) is a key component for synthesis and maintenance of telomeres on chromosome ends and is required for the continued proliferation of cells. Estimation of hTERT expression therefore has broad relevance in oncology and stem cell research. Several splicing variants of hTERT have been described whose regulated expression contributes to the control of telomerase activity. Knowledge of the different hTERT mRNA isoforms and the ability to distinguish between them is an important issue when evaluating telomerase expression.D003110Colonic Neoplasms
TERT16939641Characterization of novel alternative splicing sites in human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT): analysis of expression and mutual correlation in mRNA isoforms from normal and tumour tissues.Human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT) is a key component for synthesis and maintenance of telomeres on chromosome ends and is required for the continued proliferation of cells. Estimation of hTERT expression therefore has broad relevance in oncology and stem cell research. Several splicing variants of hTERT have been described whose regulated expression contributes to the control of telomerase activity. Knowledge of the different hTERT mRNA isoforms and the ability to distinguish between them is an important issue when evaluating telomerase expression.D008175Lung Neoplasms
TERT19079992[Changes of alternative splicing variants of human telomerase reverse transcriptase during gastric carcinogenesis].The expression of human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT) is positively correlated to the activity of telomerase. Alternative splicing exists in the transcription of hTERT and special splicing patterns may change during tumor progression. This study was to reveal the changes of hTERT alterative splicing pattern in gastric carcinogenesis.D005757Gastritis, Atrophic
TERT19079992[Changes of alternative splicing variants of human telomerase reverse transcriptase during gastric carcinogenesis].The expression of human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT) is positively correlated to the activity of telomerase. Alternative splicing exists in the transcription of hTERT and special splicing patterns may change during tumor progression. This study was to reveal the changes of hTERT alterative splicing pattern in gastric carcinogenesis.D011230Precancerous Conditions
TERT19079992[Changes of alternative splicing variants of human telomerase reverse transcriptase during gastric carcinogenesis].The expression of human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT) is positively correlated to the activity of telomerase. Alternative splicing exists in the transcription of hTERT and special splicing patterns may change during tumor progression. This study was to reveal the changes of hTERT alterative splicing pattern in gastric carcinogenesis.D013274Stomach Neoplasms
TERT19188747Changes of the alternative splicing variants of human telomerase reverse transcriptase during gastric carcinogenesis.We attempted to reveal the changes of the human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT) alternative splicing pattern in gastric carcinogenesis.D000230Adenocarcinoma
TERT19188747Changes of the alternative splicing variants of human telomerase reverse transcriptase during gastric carcinogenesis.We attempted to reveal the changes of the human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT) alternative splicing pattern in gastric carcinogenesis.D005757Gastritis, Atrophic
TERT19188747Changes of the alternative splicing variants of human telomerase reverse transcriptase during gastric carcinogenesis.We attempted to reveal the changes of the human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT) alternative splicing pattern in gastric carcinogenesis.D008679Metaplasia
TERT19188747Changes of the alternative splicing variants of human telomerase reverse transcriptase during gastric carcinogenesis.We attempted to reveal the changes of the human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT) alternative splicing pattern in gastric carcinogenesis.D011230Precancerous Conditions
TERT19188747Changes of the alternative splicing variants of human telomerase reverse transcriptase during gastric carcinogenesis.We attempted to reveal the changes of the human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT) alternative splicing pattern in gastric carcinogenesis.D013274Stomach Neoplasms
TERT20225759Changes of telomerase activity by alternative splicing of full-length and beta variants of hTERT in breast cancer patients.Human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT) expression level may not always correlate with telomerase activity. Although the positions of the spliced sites suggest that many of the variants do not code for functional reverse transcriptase, the functions of the spliced variants of hTERT are unknown. We analyzed hTERT splicing patterns with respect to telomerase activity in breast cancer. We examined telomerase activity by telomeric repeat amplification protocol (TRAP) assay and detected spliced variants of hTERT by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Of 45 breast cancer patients, 38 (84%) were found to express telomerase activity and 41 (91%) expressed hTERT. In patients with telomerase activity, 14 (37%) expressed all four types of variants (full length, alpha, beta, and alpha/beta). Eleven patients (29%) expressed both the full-length and beta variant. Eight patients (22%) expressed the beta variant only and 3 (8%) expressed the full-length type only. When comparing telomerase activity to the expression of splicing variants, a tendency was found for lower telomerase activity in patients expressing the beta variant only (45 +/- 11) versus those expressing all four types (64 +/- 32) and those coexpressing the full-length type with the beta variant (61 +/- 22) (p = 0.06, respectively). In patients with both full-length and beta variants coexpression, increment of beta variant showed a decreased telomerase activity regardless of the full-length variant expression (p = 0.027). Telomerase activity changed with alternative splicing of the full-length and beta variants expression of hTERT in breast cancer.D001943Breast Neoplasms
TERT20225759Changes of telomerase activity by alternative splicing of full-length and beta variants of hTERT in breast cancer patients.Human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT) expression level may not always correlate with telomerase activity. Although the positions of the spliced sites suggest that many of the variants do not code for functional reverse transcriptase, the functions of the spliced variants of hTERT are unknown. We analyzed hTERT splicing patterns with respect to telomerase activity in breast cancer. We examined telomerase activity by telomeric repeat amplification protocol (TRAP) assay and detected spliced variants of hTERT by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Of 45 breast cancer patients, 38 (84%) were found to express telomerase activity and 41 (91%) expressed hTERT. In patients with telomerase activity, 14 (37%) expressed all four types of variants (full length, alpha, beta, and alpha/beta). Eleven patients (29%) expressed both the full-length and beta variant. Eight patients (22%) expressed the beta variant only and 3 (8%) expressed the full-length type only. When comparing telomerase activity to the expression of splicing variants, a tendency was found for lower telomerase activity in patients expressing the beta variant only (45 +/- 11) versus those expressing all four types (64 +/- 32) and those coexpressing the full-length type with the beta variant (61 +/- 22) (p = 0.06, respectively). In patients with both full-length and beta variants coexpression, increment of beta variant showed a decreased telomerase activity regardless of the full-length variant expression (p = 0.027). Telomerase activity changed with alternative splicing of the full-length and beta variants expression of hTERT in breast cancer.D018270Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast
TERT20225759Changes of telomerase activity by alternative splicing of full-length and beta variants of hTERT in breast cancer patients.Human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT) expression level may not always correlate with telomerase activity. Although the positions of the spliced sites suggest that many of the variants do not code for functional reverse transcriptase, the functions of the spliced variants of hTERT are unknown. We analyzed hTERT splicing patterns with respect to telomerase activity in breast cancer. We examined telomerase activity by telomeric repeat amplification protocol (TRAP) assay and detected spliced variants of hTERT by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Of 45 breast cancer patients, 38 (84%) were found to express telomerase activity and 41 (91%) expressed hTERT. In patients with telomerase activity, 14 (37%) expressed all four types of variants (full length, alpha, beta, and alpha/beta). Eleven patients (29%) expressed both the full-length and beta variant. Eight patients (22%) expressed the beta variant only and 3 (8%) expressed the full-length type only. When comparing telomerase activity to the expression of splicing variants, a tendency was found for lower telomerase activity in patients expressing the beta variant only (45 +/- 11) versus those expressing all four types (64 +/- 32) and those coexpressing the full-length type with the beta variant (61 +/- 22) (p = 0.06, respectively). In patients with both full-length and beta variants coexpression, increment of beta variant showed a decreased telomerase activity regardless of the full-length variant expression (p = 0.027). Telomerase activity changed with alternative splicing of the full-length and beta variants expression of hTERT in breast cancer.D018275Carcinoma, Lobular
TERT22723897Quantification of alternative splicing variants of human telomerase reverse transcriptase and correlations with telomerase activity in lung cancer.Telomerase plays important roles in the development and progression of malignant tumors, and its activity is primarily determined by transcriptional regulation of human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT). Several mRNA alternative splicing variants (ASVs) for hTERT have been identified, but it remains unclear whether telomerase activity is directly associated with hTERT splicing transcripts. In this study, we developed novel real-time PCR protocols using molecular beacons and applied to lung carcinoma cell lines and cancerous tissues for quantification of telomerase activity and three essential hTERT deletion transcripts respectively. The results showed that lung carcinoma cell lines consistently demonstrated telomerase activity (14.22-31.43 TPG units per 100 cells) and various hTERT alternative splicing transcripts. For 165 lung cancer cases, telomerase activity showed significant correlation with tumor differentiation (poorly->moderately->well-differentiated, P<0.01) and with histotypes (combined small cell and squamous cell carcinoma>squamous cell carcinoma>adenosquamous carcinoma>adenocarcinoma, P<0.05). Although the overall hTERT transcripts were detected in all the samples, they were not associated with telomerase activity (r = 0.092, P = 0.24). Telomerase activity was significantly correlated with the transcriptional constituent ratio of α-deletion (r = -0.267, P = 0.026), β-deletion (r = -0.693, P = 0.0001) and γ-deletion (r = -0.614, P = 0.001). The positive rate and average constituent ratio of β-deletion transcripts (92.12%, 0.23) were higher than those of α-deletion (41.82%, 0.12) or γ-deletion (16.36%, 0.18) transcripts. The combined small-cell and squamous cell carcinomas expressed less deletion transcripts, especially β-deletion, than other histotypes, which might explain their higher telomerase activity. In conclusion, the molecular beacon-based real-time PCR protocols are rapid, sensitive and specific methods to quantify telomerase activity and hTERT ASVs. Telomerase activity may serve as a reliable and effective molecular marker to assist the evaluation of histological subtype and differentiation of lung carcinomas. Further studies on hTERT deletion splicing transcripts, rather than the overall hTERT transcripts, may improve our understanding of telomerase regulation.D008175Lung Neoplasms
TERT23610451The major reverse transcriptase-incompetent splice variant of the human telomerase protein inhibits telomerase activity but protects from apoptosis.Human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT; the catalytic protein subunit of telomerase) is subjected to numerous alternative splicing events, but the regulation and function of these splice variants is obscure. Full-length hTERT includes conserved domains that encode reverse transcriptase activity, RNA binding, and other functions. The major splice variant termed α+β- or β-deletion is highly expressed in stem and cancer cells, where it codes for a truncated protein lacking most of the reverse transcriptase domain but retaining the known RNA-binding motifs. In a breast cancer cell panel, we found that β-deletion was the hTERT transcript that was most highly expressed. Splicing of this transcript was controlled by the splice regulators SRSF11, HNRNPH2, and HNRNPL, and the β-deletion transcript variant was associated with polyribosomes in cells. When ectopically overexpressed, β-deletion protein competed for binding to telomerase RNA (hTR/TERC), thereby inhibiting endogenous telomerase activity. Overexpressed β-deletion protein localized to the nucleus and mitochondria and protected breast cancer cells from cisplatin-induced apoptosis. Our results reveal that a major hTERT splice variant can confer a growth advantage to cancer cells independent of telomere maintenance, suggesting that hTERT makes multiple contributions to cancer pathophysiology.D001943Breast Neoplasms
TERT23933091Physiological and pathological significance of human telomerase reverse transcriptase splice variants.Human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT) is tightly regulated at various transcriptional and post-transcriptional levels. Alternative splicing of hTERT has been shown in many human tissues and cell lines regardless of telomerase status and may play a role in regulation of telomerase activity and other cellular functions. Catalytically inactive splice variants make up a substantial proportion of total hTERT mRNA and are at least partly translated into protein. Shifts in splicing patterns occur in development, tumorigenesis and in response to exogenous stimuli in a tissue- and cell type-specific manner. This review focuses on prevalence, patterns and regulation of hTERT alternative splicing, describes associations with telomerase activity and telomere length, and discusses the potential significance of hTERT alternative splice variants in cancer as well as possible telomere-independent functions.D063646Carcinogenesis
TERT23933091Physiological and pathological significance of human telomerase reverse transcriptase splice variants.Human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT) is tightly regulated at various transcriptional and post-transcriptional levels. Alternative splicing of hTERT has been shown in many human tissues and cell lines regardless of telomerase status and may play a role in regulation of telomerase activity and other cellular functions. Catalytically inactive splice variants make up a substantial proportion of total hTERT mRNA and are at least partly translated into protein. Shifts in splicing patterns occur in development, tumorigenesis and in response to exogenous stimuli in a tissue- and cell type-specific manner. This review focuses on prevalence, patterns and regulation of hTERT alternative splicing, describes associations with telomerase activity and telomere length, and discusses the potential significance of hTERT alternative splice variants in cancer as well as possible telomere-independent functions.D009369Neoplasms


Clinically important variants in TERT


check button (ClinVar, 04/20/2024)
accession_iduniprot_idgene_nameTypeVariantClinical_significance